Navajos to save coal plant themselves — Too important to tribe’s economy

“Approximately 750 people, mostly Native Americans, work at the plant and Kayenta Mine that supplies it when the facilities are fully operational. The tribe also benefits from lease payments, coal royalties and myriad ancillary transactions, such as selling power to the mine.”

Source: AZCentral.com Web | PDF

NIPSCO dubiously claims cost savings from shuttering coal plants

These alleged cost-savings are prospective and imaginary — so current management will not be held to account when they don’t materialize. Moreover, they depend on a non-existent price for CO2 as well as subsidy farming. There is no cheaper source of electricity than maintaining existing coal plants.

Source: IndyStar.com Web | PDF

Do electric utilities really support rolling back the Clean Power Plan?

While electric utilities quietly support the rollback of the Clean Power Plan via rulemaking comments (see below), they loudly boast about abandoning coal as fast as they can. What’s really going on is that the Clean Power Plan rollback has become almost irrelevant to the future of coal. Utility promises to abandon coal far exceed in scope and timeframe what would be required under the CPP. Taking their comments at face value, the utilities quietly support the CPP rollback to preserve their options — i.e., so they back out of closing coal plants when their natural gas/wind/solar/battery storage plans inevitably fail.

Continue reading Do electric utilities really support rolling back the Clean Power Plan?